SIG PUBLICATIONS

The Process Industries (PI) SIG article listed
below won a Silver Inkwell Award in 2000. We
are pleased to share this award-winning article
as one example of the kinds of articles created
by the SIGs and shared with their membership.
Implementing Real-Time
Data Capture in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing
By Dana Buker, CPIM

Today, more than ever, companies are searching for ways to move products
more rapidly through the supply chain, both
internally and externally. In support of this,
they must also be capable of capturing the relevant
product flow data more rapidly and accurately.
DuPont Pharmaceuticals recognized this need
in the early ’90s, and implemented a real-time
data capture system in 1995 for its distribution
functions. This system, commonly referred to
as ROPICS (Radio-frequency Order Picking and
Inventory Control System), was expanded to the
manufacturing processes—both continuous and
batch—in 1997.
Today, we are tracking the creation, usage, and movement of material
from the receiving dock, through the warehouse,
into and out of manufacturing, through quality
release, and into distribution—all in real time!
Company Background
DuPont Pharmaceuticals is a worldwide business that focuses on research,
development, and delivery of pharmaceuticals
to treat unmet medical needs in the fights against
HIV, cardiovascular disease, central nervous
system disorders, cancer, and arthritis-related
disorders. DuPont Pharmaceuticals is also a
leader in medical imaging. It operates three
manufacturing sites that are located in Massachusetts,
New York, and Puerto Rico.
Project Background
Throughout the company’s history—and especially with the 1994 advent
of a fully integrated and unified ERP package,
Business Planning and Control System (BPCS)—emphasis
has been placed on multisite involvement to
maximize efficiencies and keep costs under control
through collaboration and standardization. Although
there are differences in areas of the operations
at the three manufacturing sites, the company
has maintained excellent communication channels
so that standardized processes and solutions
are implemented wherever possible. This results
in reduced support requirements and the ability
to speak the same language when it comes to
most ERP-related discussions.
The implementation of BPCS made obvious the interdependence among
various functional areas such as manufacturing,
planning, finance, and customer service. The
traditional stovepipe approach to business died
quickly as a result of implementing an integrated
ERP system. Multifunctional, collaborative teams
are the norm rather than the exception at DuPont
Pharmaceuticals. Employees recognize the need
to work as a team to be successful.
The operations bar code team is no exception. Since its inception
in 1997, the team has included representatives
from finance, information resources (IR), manufacturing,
planning, production planning and inventory
control, quality control, validation, and other
functions as needed.
Keith Evans from DuPont’s Wilmington IR staff, Dana Buker from manufacturing,
and the integrator, Stephen Brazzell from Innovatum,
Inc., in Lawrenceville, Georgia, make up a core
team that has been in place since the project’s
beginning. The continuity of a stable core team
is also seen as a key to success.
Approved, recognized, and supported at all levels of the organization,
the project owes much of its success to top-level
management buy-in throughout the process, as
well as impressive levels of participation by,
and involvement of, personnel at the manufacturing
sites. The commitment and dedication have been
phenomenal. The folks at the plants have truly
taken ownership of the system and have absolutely
no desire to return to the days of (more) pen
and paper.
System Development
The Development Process. System
selection was one of the first major tasks taken
on by the team, which quickly discovered
that there are many potential solutions available.
However, unlike the two-tier ROPICS, the only
viable candidates were of a three-tier architecture.
The difference between the two
types is that in a three-tier system, a replicated
database of critical files is periodically fed
to a server between the user and the main database
(or host) computer. This is what the client
application "talks to" in real time. Added complexity,
synchronization, and support considerations
made this option unattractive.
ROPICS, on the other
hand, updates the host BPCS database in real
time with no intermediate stopping points. The
functionality required to support manufacturing
transactions would need to be expanded in ROPICS;
however, more than 70 percent of the design
and development work was already done.
The cost analysis also indicated that a three-tier design would be
more than $200,000 more expensive to purchase
and would take longer to implement. After doing
its homework, the team agreed unanimously that
the best choice in this case was obvious—ROPICS.
Hardware. The BPCS application
runs on IBM AS/400s, which are accessible through
dedicated communication lines and a LAN and
WAN system developed, installed, and maintained
by DuPont employees.
Given DuPont’s established contract with a major hardware provider—Intermec
Corporation—the team agreed to build on existing
designs and equipment and use Intermec for the
hardware. Other potential suppliers were investigated
to confirm that the Intermec solution was the
best choice. The Intermec hardware consists
of hand-held portable computers, 2.4 GHz radio
access points, and label printers.
Based on an Intermec survey, radio antennae were positioned strategically
throughout the plants to provide needed coverage.
Hand-held computers were purchased for each
group that would need them, including warehouse,
quality control, manufacturing, packaging, and
IR (for development and training).
Software. ROPICS is essentially
a front-end application for communication with
the ERP backbone. Should a decision ever be
reached to switch ERP suppliers, simply building
the linkage to another back-end system will
make it possible to keep ROPICS in place. In
that event, implementation, training, and validation
efforts would be greatly simplified for the
conversion.
The ROPICS package was upgraded to include functionality in support
of manufacturing transactions such as shop order
issues and receipts, packaging reconciliation,
and labor reporting. The existing functions
for receiving, put-away, cycle counting, and
customer order processing were essentially left
as is.
ROPICS communicates data from and to the host with an average response
time of less than three seconds. The data sent
to the host are validated, and any discrepancies
are immediately identified to the user for corrective
action. This is especially impressive in the
cases of the Atlanta Distribution Center and
the Garden City, New York, sites, since the
host AS/400s are located hundreds of miles from
the sites.
The small 2" x 2" screens on the hand-held computers represented
a design challenge, since the system had to
give the users enough information to do their
jobs efficiently without exceeding the available
real estate. Evans and Brazzell did a fantastic
job of identifying the minimum amount of data
needed for the transaction and inquiry screens
so that the system would be both user friendly
and extremely compact.
Procedures and Training. All related
procedures were maintained to support the implementation.
Site resources were recruited to update system
documentation. The revised draft documents became
the basis for most of the training, which was
developed by team personnel. A training schedule
was prepared for each group using the new tools,
ultimately training more than 180 new users.
Because this technology—as well as MRP and inventory management concepts—were
brand new to most ROPICS users, "basic" users
were required to attend a minimum of eight hours
of training over a one-month period, while "super"
users received a minimum of 16 hours. According
to local site policies, all affected procedures
for the sites were updated and in final form
before implementation.
Testing. The pharmaceutical industry
is among the most tightly regulated, with all
systems used in the process of manufacturing,
packaging, holding, and distributing drugs highly
scrutinized and subject to requirements set
forth in the Code of Federal Regulations. DuPont
Pharmaceuticals manages the BPCS and ROPICS
applications under these guidelines; accordingly,
the testing process is well documented.
The enhanced version of ROPICS installed at the manufacturing sites
was formally tested and documented, with users
testing each new or upgraded process under an
approved validation plan. This plan consists
primarily of an installation qualification (IQ),
operation qualification (OQ), and performance
qualification (PQ). Each section is made up
of a series of test scripts, which can be tied
back to the system’s agreed-upon functional
requirements. Although the process is resource
intensive and time consuming, it is extremely
valuable and worthwhile. The testing is also
a useful training tool.
The IQ proves that the hardware and software have been properly installed
in accordance with vendor specifications and
change control procedures. The OQ is used to
verify that the newly designed functions will
work within the framework of the designed system
by properly trained users using appropriate
procedures and equipment in the physical location
where the transactions will be processed. The
PQ tests the performance of the system in the
production environment.
More than 100 tests were conducted to prove that the system would
perform as expected. As a part of the testing
process, any issues discovered were formally
addressed and resolved. All IQ and OQ issues
must be resolved before implementation. PQ issues
must be resolved quickly depending on severity.
Validation and Change Control
The rigorous testing and change control process is an integral part
of the system’s validation. Before the start
of testing, a validation plan and related protocols
are reviewed and approved by all groups. Member(s)
of the quality organization must review all
test scripts before and after execution. In
addition, an overall validation plan including
IQ, OQ, and PQ protocols is reviewed and approved
by a multifunctional group of responsible personnel,
including quality assurance and the validation
department. Post-implementation summary reports
for each "Q" are written and, finally, a validation
summary report is prepared, reviewed, and approved
before the administrative documentation can
be considered complete.
The company follows a strict change control process for all new systems
and upgrades to existing systems. The result
is one set of core code at all company sites.
The complex system meets the company’s many
requirements and yet is controlled and maintainable.
Also, because all sites have the same code,
the training and testing required to implement
and/or expand the utility of the system to all
sites are facilitated.
Implementation
Cutover. Before each implementation,
a cutover plan is established to verify that
all required preproduction tasks have been completed
and that the required control and coordination
of the implementation process are properly planned
and resourced. The heart of the plan is a checklist
of tasks to be completed before, during, and
after cutover, with responsibility assigned
to the primary responsible function.
Consideration is given to system configuration, database maintenance,
training, documentation, support, and business
resumption (or fallback) plans. Responsible
leadership from all functional groups must review
and approve the cutover plan before implementation.
On the days of implementation at each site, a final readiness check
was conducted, and sign-off on the startup process
was collected from the management. Users were
prepared, systems were double-checked, and support
infrastructure was in place and communicated
to the user community. Project team members
were assigned to provide on-site, in-area support
for all shifts. Team members made routine tours
of the facility to address startup questions
and resolve any issues that came up. Thanks
to adherence to a proven well-documented process
and some practice using it, the startups went
very smoothly.
Post-Implementation Process. For
two weeks after implementation, a post-implementation
process (a continuation of the issue-resolution
process, as well as ongoing, on-site, in-area
team member troubleshooting and assistance)
was carried out.
A
celebration—generally an all-inclusive, on-site
luncheon—was held within a few weeks of each
implementation to recognize the support and
involvement of all the users in addition to
the core team members.
Summary
In just a little more than a year, two manufacturing sites were performing
more than 98 percent of their internal supply
chain transactions in real time. The resulting
benefits include
•
real-time, highly accurate inventory information
•
data to assist with the identification of bottlenecks
and process cycle time
•
15 percent labor reduction in warehousing operations
•
5 percent labor reduction in packaging operations
•
20 percent lead-time reduction in receiving
operations through process improvement
•
improved scheduling resulting from greater inventory
accuracy.
To maintain a competitive advantage, industry must be in the business
of speeding up all processes associated with
internal and external supply chains, while simultaneously
improving overall product quality. DuPont Pharmaceuticals
has enthusiastically embraced this philosophy,
as exemplified through the project described
here.
As of this writing Dana Buker, CPIM,was manufacturing systems manager
for DuPont Pharmaceuticals. He has more than
20 years of diverse pharmaceutical manufacturing
and planning systems experience and has been
a member of APICS since 1982. He can now be
reached at (877) 277-3016 or BUKERD@innovatum.com
If you are not an APICS member and would like to affiliate with one
or more SIGs, download a membership
application. If you are already an APICS
member and would like to expand your member
services to include one or more of the SIGs,
visit the Join a SIG section.
|